Washington Post Media’s Katharine Weymouth on why running the business is tough; “You have to fail. You have to make mistakes in order to have the successes”

June 9, 2013 1:50 pm

Katharine Weymouth, publisher, Washington Post Media

By Emily Steel

b57ef33aedf0400ec8f61be2eac990c5cn_image.size.washington-post

New edition: Katharine Weymouth is the fifth member of the Graham family to be publisher of Washington Post Media; From left: publisher Katharine Weymouth, former executive editor Ben Bradlee, former chairman and C.E.O. Katharine Graham, current executive editor Marcus Brauchli, and chairman and C.E.O. Don Graham.

Scotch-taped to the door of Katharine Weymouth’s office in the executive suite of theWashington Post headquarters are printouts of two photographs she took during a visit last year to Facebook’s Silicon Valley headquarters.

In bold, red, capital letters, one poster asks: “What would you do if you weren’t afraid?” The other reads: “Done is better than perfect.”

The proclamations are a constant reminder to the publisher of one of the US’s most venerable newspapers to embrace the Valley’s culture of endorsing failure – a somewhat foreign notion in the world of traditional media.

“You have to fail. You have to make mistakes in order to have the successes,” she says. “We in the media are not very forgiving of traditional organisations making mistakes.”Ms Weymouth would know. A great-granddaughter of Eugene Meyer, the California-born financier who bought the Washington Post for $825,000 in a 1933 bankruptcy auction, the family’s history and her own legacy are entwined with that of the newspaper.

Katharine Graham, her grandmother, took charge of the Washington Post in 1963 after her husband committed suicide. The only woman chief executive in the entire Fortune 1,000 at the time, Graham led the newspaper through one of its
most storied periods, including the Watergate scandal, as well as taking the broader Washington Post Company public.

Ms Weymouth’s mother, the journalist Lally Weymouth, circles the globe, interviewing heads of state for the Post. Her uncle Donald Graham was a reporter at the paper, eventually becoming publisher then taking over as chief executive of the Washington Post Company in 1991.

Ms Weymouth, 47, is now in the position of preserving that history at the same time as breaking from tradition to rescue the future of this institution of American journalism. “Sometimes that means not doing something the same way you’ve done it for 50 years, or 100 years,” she says with her brown eyes open wide, striking a resemblance to the photographs of her grandmother hanging throughout the office.

It wasn’t always a given that the tall, blonde Manhattan-raised ballet student-turned-lawyer would end up in the family business. After three years at a prominent Washington law firm, she started as an assistant counsel for the Post, then moved to the advertising department.

The CV

● Born: May 28 1966
● Education: 1988 Harvard College with a BA magna cum laude in literature
● 1988 Oxford university. No degree. One-year study in literature.
● 1992 Stanford Law School with a JD
● Career: 1993 Joins Washington law firm Williams & Connolly as an associate
● 1996 Moves to Washington Post to work as an assistant counsel
● 1998 Associate counsel for washingtonpost.com
● 2000 Starts working in the advertising department at the Washington Post
● 2005 Appointed vice-president of advertising
● 2008 Takes over as publisher and chief executive of Washington Post Media
● Family: divorced, with three children
● Interests: cooking, books, skiing

Wearing her grandmother’s string of pearls to mark the occasion, Ms Weymouth became publisher in February 2008. One of just a few members of the family working at the Washington Post Company, it has long been rumoured that Ms Weymouth is being groomed to take over the family-controlled company.

Seven months after her appointment, the economy crashed, shaking the already fragile foundations of a newspaper industry facing digital disruption. In her first full year as publisher, the newspaper group lost $164m. (Excluding pension payments and other expenses, cash losses were $33m that year.) Mr Graham wrote in a letter to shareholders in 2009 that he had no answer to the question of the future of the newspaper industry.

“My mother lived until 2001, so she saw the beginnings of the internet, the beginnings of washingtonpost.comand the beginnings of the impact of technology on newspapers,” Mr Graham says. “She used to say to me: ‘You and Katharine have it so much harder than I did.’ That’s true.”

Early in her tenure, Ms Weymouth made herself a model of media access. But soon, dramatic cost-cuts, round after round of lay-offs, contentious plans for exclusive “salon” dinners at her home, the closing of a printing plant and reported clashes with her first pick for editor, Marcus Brauchli, dominated the headlines.

Outsiders wondered if the paper had a strategy to carry it into the future. Ms Weymouth quietly stepped out of the spotlight. “Thank goodness. I like it that way,” she says with a smile.

Today, Ms Weymouth, who calls the Post a “daily miracle” and regularly tweets her favourite stories in the paper, is ready to talk again. “I am a family member in this position during a time of tremendous change,” she says.

“And, because part of what I have to do is cost cutting, it’s easier, I think, to write the story of, you know, woe is me, the Washington Post isn’t what it once was under her grandmother’s heyday. That is the easiest story to write, but not the right one. I don’t think it’s the truth.”

She says that the Post has got its momentum back. There’s a new editor, Martin Baron, the rollout of a much-anticipated paywall to charge for access to the website, investments in a new digital video studio and a series of new business ventures, ranging from a deals business à la Groupon to a live conference business, that are starting to pay off.

“I didn’t anticipate when I took over that the economy would fall off the cliff, which, of course, just added to the pressure that our business already was under. But everybody says never let a good crisis go to waste, and I think it forced us to do things quicker,” she says.

You have to fail. You have to make mistakes in order to have the successes

Rather than creating entirely new technologies, she says the Post must experiment and adapt constantly to changes in how people consume news, mentioning a new political video series under way. “It’s thinking about our users first. I think that’s something we didn’t use to be very good at,” she says. “We used to be much more Moses bringing the tablets down to people.”

The Post long has been a holdout in charging for access to its website. This week, it will join hundreds of other newspapers with the rollout of its metered pay wall.

Ms Weymouth notes her trepidation about turning away readers, mentioning her “lots and lots of incredibly well-educated friends” who monitor their use of the New York Times so that they won’t hit a pay wall. But she says it was time, recounting a story about receiving a $50 cheque in the mail from a reader who said he felt guilty each time he read the Post for free online.

“What do I do with this?” Ms Weymouth recalls saying. “We don’t have a bucket for charity.”

While print circulation has continued its steady slide, the audience of washingtonpost.com is growing. Traffic rose 23 per cent in April against the same period last year, with more than 26m unique visitors to the site, according to ComScore, the digital analytics company.

Just last week it broke news that the National Security Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation were mining data from nine US internet companies – one of its biggest scoops under Mr Baron.

To be sure, challenges remain. The Post is a much smaller operation than it once was, having retrenched from its ambitions to compete on the national and international stage with the closing of several bureaux. Revenues in the newspaper publishing group last year were about a third of what they were in 2008, but the unit managed to eke out a profit in 2012 for the third year in a row before certain one-time costs and non-cash pension expenses.

Mr Weymouth is attempting to create a formula to preserve the Post for future generations. The motivation is both worldly and close to home. Her 13-year-old daughter wants to be a reporter, she says, and her youngest has informed her she wants her job.

April 2012

Ghosts in the Newsroom

Despite The Washington Post’s history of swashbuckling journalism, its business strategy has been deeply conservative. Can the heirs to Kay Graham and Ben Bradlee’s legacy—Graham’s son Don, the chairman and C.E.O.; her granddaughter Katharine Weymouth, the publisher; and executive editor Marcus Brauchli—save the Post from a lack of vision? Sarah Ellison follows the money, the management battles, and the missed opportunities at a great American newspaper.

By Sarah EllisonIllustration by Sean McCabe

Before it was refurbished, a few years ago, the lobby of The Washington Post’s office building was dominated by oversize photographs of important moments in the history of the newspaper. Visitors walked past the famous image of Katharine Graham, the paper’s matriarch, and her beloved executive editor, Ben Bradlee, as they emerged, laughing, from the Supreme Court in 1971 after the justices ruled in favor of the Post in its battle to publish the Pentagon Papers, the U.S. government’s secret history of the Vietnam War. Visitors also saw an enlarged copy of thenixon resigns front page from 1974, marking the culmination of the paper’s Watergate coverage.

Donald Graham, the son of Katharine Graham, and the current chairman and C.E.O. of the Washington Post Company, has been coming into the building as an employee ever since he started as a Metro reporter, in 1971. David Von Drehle, a former assistant managing editor of the Post, recalls a day in 1994 when he found himself in the lobby alone with Graham. “I just came from an anniversary celebration of the most important moment in the history of our paper,” Graham told Von Drehle. “Do you know which one it was?” Graham pointed to a picture of his grandfather Eugene Meyer and his father, Philip Graham, holding up a copy of the newspaper dated March 17, 1954—the first edition of the combined Washington Post and Washington Times-Herald, a merger that established the Post’s dominance in Washington. (At the time, Meyer remarked, “The real significance of this event is that it makes the paper safe for Donnie.”) Von Drehle says, “Everything else, whether it was Watergate or all the Pulitzers—all of that flowed from the incredible cash cow the paper became when it had the monopoly of the Washington metro area. That was always very illuminating to me of Don’s thinking.”

The Washington Post is haunted by its history. Dominated by towering figures such as Katharine Graham (who died in 2001), Ben Bradlee (who stepped down as executive editor in 1991), and the reporters who pursued the Watergate scandal, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, the mythology of the Post was always grander than the reality. No other newspaper enjoyed quite the hype the Post did during its heyday. And few papers are as defined by their city as the Post has been defined by Washington—“Washington” meaning both the nation’s capital and a metropolis in its own right. Don Graham’s devotion to his city has never wavered. “I can’t imagine existing anywhere else,” he told me when I sat down with him recently. From the moment he became publisher, in 1979, he insisted that the newspaper must concentrate on its Washington readers. But not everyone got the message. Inside the Post, there was always a powerful tension between Graham’s view and the view of the newsroom, which, starting with Bradlee and for a period of decades, sought to compete on a national stage with The New York Times—and to a significant degree succeeded.

For much of that time, the paper’s profits supported both views. Then came the Internet and new competition for readers and advertising dollars. The Post’s response to dwindling revenues has been to narrow its focus again to Washington. The paper’s current publisher, Katharine Weymouth, who is Don Graham’s niece, embodied her approach in a slogan in 2008: for and about washington. But the newspaper is no longer the only publication laying claim to that title. It must now fight off threats from online upstarts and other D.C.-focused outlets, such as Politico, National Journal, and Roll Call, which have eaten into thePost’s revenues and undercut its mission. The newspaper division of the company posted an operating loss of $193 million in 2008 and $164 million in 2009. For the first nine months of 2011, the division reported an operating loss of $25.6 million. Daily circulation of the print edition is now just over 500,000, down from 830,000 two decades ago. ThePost’s belated attempt to revive its Web site has drawn traffic, but the effort has been plagued by technical issues. The key architect of the site’s redesign said in January that he was leaving the paper. Meanwhile, the Post has been losing some of its most talented journalists, let go in buyouts or wooed away by more ambitious and wealthier rivals. (The most recent round of buyouts, the fifth since 2003, was announced in February.) The newspaper has shuttered all of its national bureaus, and the newsroom churns with rumors of a deteriorating relationship between Weymouth and the editor she hired just a few years ago, Marcus Brauchli.

The desire to compete as a journalistic enterprise on a national or international level—to do so comprehensively and consistently—seems to have been beaten out of the Post. The disaffection on the newsroom floor is audible and undisguised. With every year there are fewer journalistic voices in America that combine seriousness of purpose with high standards and relentless ambition, and that can sometimes reach and inform the nation as a whole. What is at stake is very simple: whether the Post can remain one of them.

“dear mrs. graham …”

You can blame what has happened to the Post on a perfect storm of unexpected developments—but that is only part of the story. The truth is that the Washington Post Company has long been animated by a particular vision, one that led executives to give short shrift to other possibilities along the way. The company was also lulled into a sense of financial security by the success of some of its non-newspaper investments, notably in the test-prep and for-profit education company Kaplan.

When Warren Buffett slid into his regular corner table at his favorite steak house, Piccolo Pete’s, in his hometown of Omaha, Nebraska, the first question he asked me was “Did you know her?” I had come to Omaha to talk to him about the Washington Post Company, of which he was a director for many years, and he was showing me a thick, leather-bound photo album and scrapbook, with golden lettering on the front: “The Washington Post Company 1973–2011.” The album had been presented to Buffett six months earlier, at his final board meeting. It was a compilation of photographs and correspondence with executives, editors, and board members over the past 38 years.

Though he didn’t specify, the “her” he was referring to was Katharine “Kay” Graham. Buffett was introduced to Kay Graham in 1971, when he met with her briefly to see if she wanted to buy Peter Fleischmann’s stake in The New Yorker. For a variety of reasons, the discussion went nowhere.

“But then two years passed and I wrote her that letter, that famous letter that’s in there,” Buffett said, gesturing to the album, where a copy of the letter was pasted. “It was the ‘Dear Mrs. Graham’ letter, as she always called it.” In it, Buffett outlined his reasons for wanting to invest in the Post Company.

“It was an incredibly cheap investment,” Buffett told me over a dinner of chicken parmigiana and root-beer floats. “The whole company at the time had a little less than five million shares outstanding. It was selling at a little over 20, so the whole Washington Post Company was selling for $100 million in the market. Now, they had The Washington Post,which was going to win the competitive struggle in Washington. They had four big network television stations, including one in Washington, D.C., and one in Miami, Florida. I mean, these are big, power stations. They had Newsweek. And they had no debt to speak of. So, if you added up what the businesses were worth at that time, they were worth at least $400 million.” In the end, Buffett bought 10 percent of the company. His stamp of approval lent the Post an aura of business savvy.

Buffett told me that he had expected to find Mrs. Graham a confident, imperious woman, but found instead that “she was a little girl in some ways and she was the most powerful owner of the company in other ways. And the two intersected, and it turned out we just hit it off.”

Buffett’s investing strategy revolves, in part, around what he calls “moated businesses”—that is, businesses whose competitive advantage is so wide that other companies cannot cross it. For him, strong newspapers were the perfect moated businesses. “In newspapers, the basic rule was survival of the fattest,” he told me. “And the trick was to be bigger than the other guy because at that point you had more help-wanted ads, you had more automobiles for sale, you had more people if you lost your dog who might find it if you ran a classified ad. And you got more dominant because to many people—this kills people in the news business—the most important news in the newspaper are the ads.” Buffett made it clear when we spoke that he understood that he was talking about an outdated model of newspapers, one that has not survived the Internet, which has thrown bridges and grappling hooks across the moat and allowed interlopers to surge inside. But it was this old-fashioned dominance that he had loved about the Post.

Post Modern
Once the richest, and perhaps the happiest, newspaper in America, The Washington Post faces the same grim odds as the rest of the industry. But unlikeThe New York Times’s Sulzberger family, the Post’s Grahams have time, popularity, and—most important—pragmatism on their side.
Katharine Graham, Carl Bernstein, Bob Woodward, managing editor Howard Simons, and executive editor Ben Bradlee in 1973. By Mark Godfrey/The Image Works.

Everybody at The Washington Post—this really may be everybody, from janitors and pressmen to reporters and ad salespeople—loves their owners, the Graham family. They love them even when they are being fired by them (or being encouraged to take buyouts). They love them even if, arguably, they’ve devolved from heralded heights to mere ordinariness, if not haplessness. They love them even when they’re being embarrassed by them.

That would be the “salons”—an embarrassing name in itself—organized at the home ofPost publisher Katharine Weymouth, the granddaughter of Katharine Graham. With a little critical interpretation, you can look at the salons as a kind of homage to her grandmother, who was beloved not just by her employees but also by the Washington elite for, among other things, her invitations. If you were invited, that meant you were powerful.

The current Katharine has two difficult if not impossible imperatives: to measure up to her family’s stature in Washington and to find new sources of income to make their newspaper viable again. She decided to combine these two goals in what must have seemed like a clever updating of her grandmother’s hospitality—she’d charge $25,000 to $250,000 to have corporations sponsor tête-à-têtes with Post reporters in her living room—but was instead perceived as selling out the stature her grandmother had achieved. Sort of like Bill Clinton and the Lincoln Bedroom.

“Well, it was a hiccup, goddamn it,” says Ben Bradlee, the Post’s beloved former editor. “It wasn’t a cough like Janet Cooke”—the Post reporter who in the 80s, under Bradlee, in the paper’s greatest black eye, won a Pulitzer Prize for a fabricated story—“now, there was a fuckup. Katharine is not a putz. God, she’s bright. Harvard Law, Stanford Law—wherever the hell she went.” All over the building, and among Post loyalists, there are abashed excuses for her. It’s a sharing of the shame, rather than a heaping on of the blame.

But can a staff’s devotion, and an owner’s ability to inspire it, save a newspaper?

The Washington Post has been no less savaged by the crumbling of the newspaper business than any other paper. It had an $86.3 million operating loss for the first half of the year. Its newsroom has been slashed from more than 900 people to about 500 in the past six years. Sections seem to disappear every day. The psychological impact, a sense of a dying or ruined world, may be greater at the Postthan at any other paper because it was, arguably, not just one of the most successful papers in the country—quality journalism combined with fat margins—but also the happiest.

There’s no evidence at all that the Post has a better handle than any other newspaper on how to retool—you’d have to put a turnstile on the Weymouth living room to make up for the Post’s current losses. And yet, if you had to look for a circumstance out of which a newspaper might have the chance to re-invent itself, the Post would be a pretty good candidate.

In part this is just dumb luck. In 1984, for no more prescient reason than that it was cheap, the Washington Post Company bought Stanley Kaplan, the S.A.T.-study company. Kaplan, accounting for more than half of the company’s revenues, now supports the place. The New York Times Company has a market value of $1.1 billion. The Post Company, because of Kaplan, has a market value of $4.5 billion.

On top of that, the Graham family is itself—separate from the Washington Post Company—stinking rich (unlike the Sulzbergers of The New York Times, who, with their company’s dividend cut to nothing, may have to sell their paper to eat).

Eugene Meyer—Katharine Graham’s father, who bought the Post in 1933—was one of the richest Americans, co-founder of Allied Chemical, a sort of Warren Buffett of his day, who left a generational fortune now administered by Katharine Graham’s son Bill.

The Grahams can afford to make mistakes—many more.

Something else. Unlike traditional newspaper families, who, having gotten rich, grow remote from their newspapers (newspapering being quite a labor-intensive, grubby business), the Grahams don’t have a separate life, or story, apart from thePost. Katharine Weymouth’s P.R. mistake was having her salons in her house instead of at a conference facility—but home and paper are, truly, mixed up for these people.

After spending the 30s and 40s losing money as he tries to turn the third newspaper in a three-paper town into an influential liberal voice, old man Meyer gives a controlling interest in the paper to his son-in-law Phil Graham, clerk to Felix Frankfurter, friend to Johnson and Kennedy, the most dashing young man in Washington, and among its most significant power brokers (responsible for putting L.B.J. on the ticket in 1960). He’s also seriously bipolar. He turns the paper into a powerhouse, consolidating its position by buying the morning competitor, the Washington Times-Herald, in 1954, trouncing the afternoon Washington Star, and adding Newsweek to the stable in 1961, as well as a group of high-profit TV stations, before turning on his father-in-law and family with anti-Semitic rage, and then killing himself, in 1963.

Katharine, his shy, ugly-duck, hopelessly maladroit wife, takes over the paper—and doesn’t sell it. Rather, she decides the paper really isn’t that good and fires the editor, a longtime family retainer, in favor of an untried, rakish, highborn Wasp type—just like her husband, but sane. She and her new editor, Ben Bradlee, out of mutual awe or need or love, form the most successful and symbiotic relationship between publisher and editor perhaps in the history of newspapers. Together they’re responsible for pursuing the two most significant stories in modern journalism (the stories that create modern journalism): when the Times is enjoined from publishing the Pentagon Papers, the government’s secret history of the Vietnam War, the Post, even more legally exposed because it’s disregarding a federal-court order, takes up publication; two years later, it breaks Watergate (and gets canonized along with its reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein in the film All the President’s Men).

Don Graham, now 64, whom the 88-year-old Bradlee—from his emeritus office on thePost’s executive floor—can remember wandering the halls when he was 10, begins to take over in the early 1980s. Graham is a modest-to-a-fault, aw-shucks Everyman. In some sense he is the exact opposite of the entitled newspaper heir. That’s his sister, Lally Weymouth—Katharine Weymouth’s mother—who moves to New York and becomes a socialite and demimonde character. Don, instead, is Mr. Steady Eddie. Uncle Don. He knows the name of everyone in the building. His lack of glamour and flashy personality might, after his mother, have been a disappointment to the paper and to Washington had it not been for the fact that he made the place a river of cash. His conservatism seemed to always pay off, not just with buying Kaplan but with not buying so much else. In the early 90s, Ben Bradlee implored Graham to buy The Boston Globe. Graham demurred and let the Times buy it, after which it almost immediately became a vast money pit—and now threatens the Times’s existence. The Post, the dominant paper not just in Washington but also in the rich counties surrounding it, was a high-profit media company, as well as, in its way, a branch of government: the White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, the Post,might pretty accurately describe the power structure in Washington.

Current publisher Katharine Weymouth. By Norman Jean Roy/CPi Syndication.

‘We didn’t see the collapse coming,” says Len Downie, the editor who ran the place after Bradlee, from his emeritus office in the Post building (nobody ever seems to leave the paper). A sense of crisis begins to hit the newspaper industry in 2004–5, but not the Post. That doesn’t happen until 2007, when, overnight, it goes from an indomitable Washington institution to a hemorrhage of cash.

Curiously, its denial phase is brief, and shortly turns into existential horror—“disconcerting and disorienting,” says Downie.

It’s suddenly clear that everybody at the paper is old. Don has run the Post for almost 30 years; Len Downie’s been the editor for almost 25 years. The paper’s stars, Bob Kaiser, Bob Woodward, Sally Quinn, are all looking at 70. The very decency of the Post has allowed the newsroom to become a retirement home—an overstaffed one at that.

July 15, 2008, 2:30pm EDT
The Last Media Tycoon
THE NEWEST GRAHAM Katharine Weymouth, photographed at the Washington Post’s printing facility in College Park, Maryland, on June 10. She is wearing her grandmother’s pearl necklace. Norman Jean Roy
Editor’s Note: Condé Nast Portfolio spoke with Katharine Weymouth prior to July 7, when the Washington Post named former Wall Street Journal managing editor Marcus Brauchli as its new executive editor. 
Nobody knows better than Katharine Weymouth that the newspaper industry is experiencing what may be called, euphemistically, a period of transition. But the new publisher of the Washington Post isn’t big on euphemisms.

“The numbers suck in our business,” the 42-year-old granddaughter of legendary Post publisher Katharine Graham declares, holding her tall, lithe frame dancer-straight, the result of a childhood spent in ballet classes.

It’s a lovely day in early April, and Weymouth is at the Post’s downtown D.C. headquarters, meeting with the staff ofStyle, one of the paper’s more popular sections. The session is a stop on the listening tour of the newsroom that she’s been conducting since February, when she was named publisher and chief executive of Washington Post Media, a newly configured unit that encompasses the newspaper’s long-divided print and Web operations. (View a slideshow featuring some of the newspaper’s major players.)

This should be a very good day at the Post. The day before, the paper won six Pulitzer Prizes, a record for the Post and the second-biggest haul ever for any newspaper in a single year. To celebrate, Weymouth threw open the doors of her decidedly unflashy home for an impromptu shindig, greeting coworkers in her bare feet and chatting with young staffers into the night.

But the afterglow is already waning, and now it’s back to the dismal reality of newspapers everywhere. “We are going to have to get smaller and better and still find a way to put out the best product we can,” Weymouth tells the assembled reporters and editors at the headquarters of the Post. “That may mean that we have to make some choices about what we can cover and what we can’t—and those are going to be hard choices.” (View a pop-up graphic showing how thePost‘s ad revenue and circulation stack up to the competition.)

Weymouth, a divorced mother of three young children, is the lone member of her generation of Grahams to work at the family-controlled, publicly traded company that her great-grandfather, Allied Chemical tycoon Eugene Meyer, bought at a bankruptcy auction in 1933. Her new role makes her the almost inevitable successor to her uncle, Washington Post Co. chairman and chief executive Don Graham, and the two can often be seen circling the Post building together, walking and talking. Don, a physically fit 63-year-old, isn’t planning to go anywhere anytime soon, and in the meantime, Weymouth must prove herself by running the unit that defines the Washington Post’s celebrated brand but that may also have the bleakest future.

The Post Co.’s performance tells the story of a fading industry: Over the past 24 years, its cable unit has prospered but the newspaper, broadcast, and magazine divisions, including Newsweek, have become dwarfed by its Kaplan unit, which offers education, test-preparation, and career-training services and whose cash flow today accounts for nearly half of the company’s $4.1 billion annual revenue. The tail has become the dog, and the Washington Post Co.—forever identified with fearless reporting on the Watergate scandal and the Pentagon Papers—now defines itself as a “diversified education and media company, with education as the largest and fastest growing business.”

Weymouth “is very talented, very smart, and she has a huge challenge, which is to be in the newspaper business at this particular time,” says longtime family friend Barry Diller, chief executive of IAC/InterActiveCorp and a director of the Post Co., whose share price recently slid below $600 from a 52-week high of $885.

At a lunch with Post editors and reporters, Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer confidently predicted that in 10 years “there will be no newspapers, no magazines that are delivered in paper form” and “no media consumption” except via the internet. Weymouth’s maybe impossible mission: to change that future—or at least figure out how the Post can survive in it.

It was probably not an omen, but shortly before she was named publisher, Weymouth was mugged at gunpoint on a Washington street. It was midnight, and she and a female friend were leaving a dinner party at the home of a Post colleague. “I always feel like I’m a tough chick and nobody is going to mess with me,” Weymouth says. “We were paying no attention to our surroundings, which we should have been. This guy comes around the corner and says, ‘Your purses.’ Then he pulled out a gun, and we realized he wasn’t joking.” Emerging from the ordeal stripped of cash, credit cards, and Weymouth’s Washington Wizards basketball tickets—but otherwise unscathed—they retreated to a lounge, where Tim the friendly bartender served them margaritas on the house to steady their jangled nerves.

Jangled nerves, of course, are the least of the challenges Weymouth faces. The Grahams today are almost the last of the great American newspaper families. They have managed to nurture and retain possession of a thriving journalistic institution while other media dynasties—the Chandlers of the Los Angeles Times, the Bancrofts of the Wall Street Journal, and the Binghams of the Louisville Times and Courier-Journal, to name a few—have loosened their grip, taken the cash from big corporate buyers, and faded into a gilded oblivion. Even the Sulzbergers of the New York Times are fighting to stay in power amid rising shareholder discontent over the company’s sinking stock price.

“It’s so amazing to see this family continue in control,” says Post Co. vice president at large Ben Bradlee, who served as the Post’s executive editor for 23 years and, with Katharine Graham, transformed the paper from a merely respectable publication into a world-class one. He adds that Weymouth’s ascension guarantees that there will be a member of the family there for another 30 years. “When I heard she was coming in, it made me feel optimistic and good,” Bradlee says. “And then when I saw her and the way she handles herself around here, with total ease and yet no sense of entitlement, I was really impressed.”

It was Weymouth’s grandfather, Philip Graham—Katharine Graham’s husband and Meyer’s son-in-law—who first put the Washington Post Co. on the map as an emerging media power. After World War II, he bought a majority stake in the local 50,000-watt CBS radio station, then the CBS television affiliate, and then a TV station in Jacksonville, Florida. Philip bought the rival Washington Times-Herald and merged it with the Post, launched a wire service with the Los Angeles Times, and acquired Newsweek magazine. But all the while, he battled a severe form of manic depression, and in August 1963 he committed suicide, shooting himself at the family farm in Virginia. Katharine Graham found his body.

The rest of the story is legendary in journalistic circles: Rejecting handsome offers from various media conglomerates to buy the company, Katharine took over as president. Shy and awkward, she felt inadequate to the task and, as she later admitted, terrified, but she was determined to keep the Post in the family. She’d spent her adult life as a wife and mother, driving a car pool for her four children, and knew little of business and nothing about management. But she steeped herself in expert advice and, with the help of a small group of executives who’d been hired by her husband, she presided over the newspaper and its related enterprises with increasing self-assurance and authority.

An outwardly correct and reticent lady (who displayed a wicked sense of humor and cursed eloquently in private), she formed a seamless partnership with Bradlee, whom she hired in 1965 as managing editor after he famously told her he’d give his “left one” to edit the Post. Together, they faced down Richard Nixon’s White House in publishing the Pentagon Papers in 1971, when government intervention could have jeopardized the Post Co.’s plans to go public. They pursued the Watergate investigation at a time when vindictive Nixon operatives were actively considering pulling the company’s broadcasting licenses.

Mrs. Graham, as she is still called by nearly everyone at the Post, died in July 2001 at age 84, after falling and sustaining head injuries while attending the Allen & Co. media-mogul retreat in Sun Valley, Idaho. But her descendants still seem to enjoy an almost mystical bond with their employees. When Weymouth made a heartfelt acceptance speech in the company auditorium on the day her promotion was announced, some Post traditionalists, such as former managing editor Bob Kaiser, were teary-eyed.

Wearing her grandmother’s pearls for luck, Weymouth told the crowd about a recent conversation she’d had with a coworker in the advertising department, where she’d spent the previous three years as vice president and director. The colleague “poked her head in my office,” Weymouth explained, “and said that there was a story that she thought I would want to hear. She asked me if I had ever noticed that often the elevators stop on the lobby floor when you have not pressed the button for the lobby. And the doors open, and no one gets on or off. I said yes, I had noticed that. She said, ‘Well, my girls think that is your grandmother getting on the elevator.’ I got chills when she told me that. And this morning, it happened to me. I was riding up from the garage level, a nervous wreck. And the elevator stopped on the lobby floor, the doors opened, and no one got on.”

The numbers do suck: The Post’s circulation and advertising are down and dropping, the cost of newsprint is through the roof, and advertising revenue from the Web isn’t growing nearly fast enough to stanch the bleeding. In 2007, the Post’s print-ad revenue plunged 13 percent from the previous year—from $573.2 million to $496.2 million (a decline hardly offset by an $11.5 million hike in the website’s revenue, an 11 percent increase over the previous year). Average daily circulation has dropped to 673,180 from a peak of 832,232 in 1993. The staff was cut earlier this year through a round of voluntary buyouts, the third since 2003, a move that cost the company a record $80 million in severance payouts. Over the past five years, the newsroom’s head count has shriveled from about 900 to less than 700, and the threat of layoffs still looms. It’s a sad, scary time. At a recent farewell party for the latest group of buyout recipients, several of them Pulitzer Prize winners, Don Graham was choked up.

“Our single-copy sales are declining by about 10 percent a year, and home delivery is almost flat,” Weymouth tells the Style staff at the April meeting. Responding to a writer who complains that the Post’s front page is often boring to readers who aren’t obsessed with politics and government, she says, “I think the evidence will tell us you’re right. There are days when I look at the front page and think we’ve done a better job, and there are days that I think, You must be kidding me!” The staffers laugh. Weymouth goes on, “There are days on Saturday that I think maybe somebody is trying to not have people buy the paper.”

Those are striking words for a newspaper publisher, whose traditional responsibilities don’t usually include second-guessing the editors on their Page One selections. In the meeting, Weymouth insists she’s not going to bigfoot editors on news judgments. “It wouldn’t be appropriate,” she says. But in her short time on the job, she’s made it clear that she’ll involve herself in all aspects of the operations that define the brand, an approach that’s symbolized by her decision to move the publisher’s office to the fifth-floor newsroom to make herself “accessible”—a highly unorthodox step strongly discouraged by her immediate predecessor, Post Co. vice chairman ­Boisfeuillet Jones Jr., one of Don Graham’s oldest friends from Harvard.

“Bo hates my idea of moving, hates it, and has tried repeatedly to talk me out of it,” Weymouth tells the Style staff. “But I don’t like to be stuffed away in a cubby. I don’t know how many of you have been to the official publisher’s office on the seventh floor. It’s like a dreadful funeral coffin.” Don Graham, who spent much of his early career as a reporter and editor, endorses the move. “Katharine came up on the business side, but she loves the newsroom and the people in it, and by being in the middle of it she’ll learn a lot, and they’ll learn a lot about her,” he says.

One thing they’ve already learned: She has opinions about almost everything. “Do you remember the rural-dentist photo, a month ago or whatever?” she asks the Style staff. “There was that elderly woman with, like, no teeth, dying in bed, and he was treating her? That was a good story, and I’m sorry to be so horrible—I’m hoping it was no one in the room who picked the photo—but there were better photos!

“I went on the website and—not to do a Sam Zell thing—they have the same dentist with a beautiful old-fashioned truck and, no kidding, a dalmatian on the hood!” Zell, the foulmouthed billionaire who recently bought the Tribune Co., appeared in a notorious YouTube video in which he accused a photographer at the Tribune-owned Orlando Sentinel of “classic journalistic arrogance.” After the photographer argued that if ordinary readers had their way, the paper would carry stories about puppy dogs at the expense of stories about Iraq, Zell responded with a bracing “Fuck you!”

“Sam Zell may be a loon with Tourette’s syndrome,” Weymouth jokes, “but he’s not crazy. To some degree, it is puppies and Iraq.”

Though Weymouth has no journalism experience, the newsroom chatter about her has been positive so far, in part because she seems down-to-earth and decisive at a time when morale is low and apprehensiveness is high. She has moved with surprising speed to exercise the publisher’s prerogative to name her own executive editor. Leonard Downie Jr., who has held that job since 1991, announced his post-Labor Day retirement plans on June 23. Countering stories suggesting the timing of his departure was Weymouth’s idea, not his, he says, “I’m 66 years old, I have a novel being published in January, I have a lot of things I want to do with my life.”

While denying publicly that she was in any hurry to replace Downie, Weymouth nevertheless did little to hide her head-hunting activities. She sounded out nearly a dozen prospects both inside and outside the paper, including current Postmanaging editor Phil Bennett, New Yorker editor and former Post staff writer David Remnick (who said he wasn’t interested in the job), and two leading outside contenders, New York Times deputy managing editor Jonathan Landman and former Wall Street Journal managing editor Marcus Brauchli, who was ousted from that job by the paper’s new owner, Rupert Murdoch, this spring.

No other decision Weymouth makes will be riskier or more important, or will reflect more seriously on her leadership. The consequences of a mistake will be dire. As this magazine went to press in late June, Weymouth appeared poised to break with Post tradition and name an outsider. Brauchli was the leading contender. “In my mind, it’s three different qualities,” she told me, about what she was looking for in her own Ben Bradlee. “One is obviously intellectual caliber—the ability to run our newsroom and identify good stories. Two is charisma and leadership…. and the third is the ability to think strategically about the newsroom of the 21st century. There has to be someone who looks around and says, Okay, what are we trying to accomplish? Now we have the Web, we have mobile, we have the Kindle and whatever other devices are going to come up, so what is the best way for us to exist in order to do the best journalism we can do?”

Meanwhile, Weymouth has also been focusing on the kind of less exalted newsroom-personnel issues that publishers have traditionally avoided. It didn’t take her long, in a series of informal one-on-ones with reporters and editors, to pick up on morale problems among the national news staff. Two and a half months after Weymouth became publisher, the section’s assistant managing editor, Susan Glasser, was removed from that position and given another one outside the newsroom, working for Don Graham on special projects. Glasser’s tense relationship with many of her reporters was already under scrutiny from her bosses. (Glasser had no comment.) Yet there’s little question that Weymouth weighed in with her concerns, which likely accelerated Glasser’s reassignment and prompted embarrassing coverage from rival news outlets, notably a detailed story about the episode in the New York Times. “It’s shocking to me,” Weymouth says about the press coverage, dismissing it as gossip but declining to comment on her role. “As publisher, I’m going to take a lot of heat for almost anything I do. Some people are going to like it and some people are going to be horrified by it.”

Weymouth joined the Post in the fall of 1996 as an in-house counsel, from the blue-chip Washington law firm Williams & Connolly. (I met her soon after she arrived at the paper—I was a reporter there from 1980 to 2003—when she was assigned to vet one of my stories. She advised me to delete some potentially libelous material. We haggled; she won.) After graduating from Harvard College and Stanford Law School—with a brief interlude at Oxford’s Wadham College, reading English literature and rowing on the Thames—she had clerked for a couple of judges in San Francisco, where she planned to make her home. But she couldn’t find suitable employment.

“I wanted to stay in California, but I graduated during a recession and couldn’t get a job in California,” she tells me over coffee at the Madison Hotel, across the street from the Post building. She’s dressed casually, in corduroy trousers, a Gap shirt, and a jacket from a New York street vendor; in a few hours, she’s taking a crew of editors to a Washington Nationals baseball game.

Moving to the Post after three years as an associate at Williams & Connolly, Weymouth spent the subsequent 11 years in a variety of positions on the paper’s business side—associate counsel to Washington Post Newsweek Interactive, which included the paper’s website, Washingtonpost.com; liaison between the often fractious advertising teams of the website and the newspaper; director of help-wanted advertising; and finally vice president of the entire advertising department, where she directed a sales force of 450. All were part of the grooming process. During that time, she presided over declining ad revenue, but Don was still impressed with her performance: “I have long and deep relationships in that department, and I knew how well people were reacting to her, and I knew how many ideas she had. I knew from several jobs ago how really smart she is about picking people.”

Katharine Graham was pleased when Weymouth finally joined the family business. “She was optimistic but uttered some cautionary words to the effect that Katharine would have to prove herself on the job, which would be true of any Graham at the Post,” says Mrs. Graham’s youngest son, Stephen, another of Weymouth’s uncles. Granddaughter and grandmother were very close; when I ran into them occasionally at Washington parties, they were clearly enjoying each other’s company. “I would often end up with nothing planned on Friday night, and we would have dinner in front of the TV and watch Jim Lehrer,” Weymouth says. “I would tell her about my dating life, and she would be amused.”

In July 1998, she married attorney Richard Scully; her wedding gown was designed by family friend Oscar de la Renta, and among the guests were Warren Buffett, Charles Schumer, Alan Greenspan, and Andrea Mitchell. Weymouth changed her surname to Scully but changed it back again when she and Scully divorced six years later.

Weymouth is herself a child of divorce. Her mother, Newsweek senior editor Lally Weymouth, who is Don’s older sister, and father, Yann Weymouth, a prominent architect, separated when Katharine was five. She grew up with her younger sister, Pamela (now a writer and teacher in California), on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, attending the posh Brearley School for girls while studying at George Balanchine’s famed School of American Ballet. “Ballet taught me discipline,” Weymouth says. “If I wanted to dance three hours a night, I had to make sure to deal with everything else, getting my homework done. I had a little schedule written out, and I didn’t like people to mess with it.”

Yann Weymouth, older brother of former Talking Heads bassist Tina Weymouth, recalls a little girl who “would worry about whether she had completed all her tasks, whether she had done all she needed to do in school, worried about doing her homework and doing it right.” The formidable Lally, known for her incisive interviews with world leaders, declined to be interviewed herself. “I can’t think of anything I’d like to do less,” she quipped, half in jest but wholly in earnest.

Weymouth learned early how to mix with grownups, many of whom were among the most distinguished in their respective fields. It was during one of her mother’s parties, when Weymouth was 11, that Norman Mailer emptied the contents of his scotch glass in Gore Vidal’s face, head-butted him, and socked him in the mouth, thus launching one of the more entertaining literary feuds of the latter half of the 20th century. Vidal memorialized the occasion as “the Night of the Tiny Fist.”

But with her own friends, Weymouth tried to keep her high-powered connections on the down-low. Molly Elkin, a Washington lawyer and daughter of novelist Stanley Elkin, knew nothing about Weymouth’s illustrious family when the two bonded while they were both at Oxford. She and Weymouth decided to travel to Israel together during a school vacation, and Weymouth offered to make all the arrangements, instructing her friend to bring a decent dress just in case they ended up at a fancy dinner. Flying out of Paris, they submitted to a routine interrogation by security-conscious officials of El Al airline. “They asked us, ‘Do you know anyone in Israel?’ ” Elkin recalls. “And I said, ‘Yes, my friend Ricky Gold, who I’ve known since I was three.’ And then Katharine pulls out a five-page typed itinerary that I didn’t even know she had with her. And it says, ‘Dinner with Leah and Yitzhak Rabin,’ who was then the defense minister. ‘Lunch in the Knesset with Bibi Netanyahu,’ ‘Visit to the Jerusalem Post to meet with editor Ari Rath’—things like that. And my reaction was to look at Katharine and say, ‘Who are you?’ ”

Once the appointment of a new executive editor is behind her, one of Weymouth’s highest priorities will be integrating the operations and staff of the newspaper and its website. The move is far more than bureaucratic; it threatens long-standing traditions and fiefdoms at the paper. The Post has long seen its internet enterprise as independent from the downtown newsroom and placed it across the Potomac River in suburban Virginia. The newsroom reported to Downie, and the website reported to Washingtonpost.com C.E.O. Caroline Little (who recently left the company). The corporate and geographical separation resulted in two very different and clashing cultures. Now the two entities for the first time report to the same person—Weymouth—a structure that, she says, reflects the “growing size and importance” of the website. “The idea, and the reason we named the new entity Washington Post Media, was so that we could really begin to think about ourselves as a media company—and not as a newspaper company and a Web company,” Weymouth tells me.

To date, revenue from the print operation still far exceeds that of the internet, but this could change. “My goal is to make sure that the Washington Post is reporting and writing great stories and distributing them to our readers on whatever platform they want to get it on. If we can do that, then it won’t matter whether revenues at the website are bigger than those at the newspaper or vice versa. If we do this right, we will be a news company.”

In short, Weymouth is the woman in charge of reinventing one of the world’s best newspapers in the age of the internet, and her success or failure at that task will be a leading indicator of the industry as a whole. “It’s going to be cutting costs and developing new products and trying new things—throwing a little more spaghetti against the wall,” she tells the Style staff. “Some of them will work and some of them won’t. I don’t think there’s a magic bullet that is going to turn our industry around.

“Think about the record companies,” she continues. “They’ve all been in this position, and some have survived it and some have not. Apple completely reinvented themselves. I.B.M. did not. TiVo did not. Microsoft constantly reinvents itself.Google has sort of a one-hit, brilliant wonder and is now trying to look for lots of other revenue streams but really hasn’t, in my mind, succeeded. So I wish I could come up with what the iPod is for us.”

Whatever Weymouth does, Liz Spayd, a Washingtonpost.com editor who is also a veteran of the downtown newsroom, predicts that the new publisher will move forcefully and fast.

“Hold on to your hats, cowboys,” Spayd says. “We’re going for a ride.”

About bambooinnovator
Kee Koon Boon (“KB”) is the co-founder and director of HERO Investment Management which provides specialized fund management and investment advisory services to the ARCHEA Asia HERO Innovators Fund (www.heroinnovator.com), the only Asian SMID-cap tech-focused fund in the industry. KB is an internationally featured investor rooted in the principles of value investing for over a decade as a fund manager and analyst in the Asian capital markets who started his career at a boutique hedge fund in Singapore where he was with the firm since 2002 and was also part of the core investment committee in significantly outperforming the index in the 10-year-plus-old flagship Asian fund. He was also the portfolio manager for Asia-Pacific equities at Korea’s largest mutual fund company. Prior to setting up the H.E.R.O. Innovators Fund, KB was the Chief Investment Officer & CEO of a Singapore Registered Fund Management Company (RFMC) where he is responsible for listed Asian equity investments. KB had taught accounting at the Singapore Management University (SMU) as a faculty member and also pioneered the 15-week course on Accounting Fraud in Asia as an official module at SMU. KB remains grateful and honored to be invited by Singapore’s financial regulator Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to present to their top management team about implementing a world’s first fact-based forward-looking fraud detection framework to bring about benefits for the capital markets in Singapore and for the public and investment community. KB also served the community in sharing his insights in writing articles about value investing and corporate governance in the media that include Business Times, Straits Times, Jakarta Post, Manual of Ideas, Investopedia, TedXWallStreet. He had also presented in top investment, banking and finance conferences in America, Italy, Sydney, Cape Town, HK, China. He has trained CEOs, entrepreneurs, CFOs, management executives in business strategy & business model innovation in Singapore, HK and China.

Leave a comment