Investors brace for end of the biotech run

March 25, 2014 5:56 pm

Investors brace for end of the biotech run

By Andrew Ward in London and Arash Massoudi in New York

When the long bull run in biotech stocks came to a shuddering halt last week, Wall Street looked south to Capitol Hill for an explanation.

Henry Waxman, the veteran Democratic congressman, was blamed for spoiling the party after he and two colleagues wrote to Gilead Sciences questioning the $84,000-per-patient price of its new hepatitis C drug, Sovaldi.

This sparked concern over whether politicians might imperil the sky-high returns forecast for a wave of new medicines emerging from the sector.

With little prospect of bipartisan support for intervention, the letter seemed a flimsy pretext for a market rout. But analysts say the Nasdaq biotech index was ripe for correction after rising two-thirds in the past year and more than threefold since a six-year low in 2009.

The focus now is on whether the pullback – the index was down 12 per cent from a month ago on Tuesday – represents a renewed buying opportunity or the start of a sustained reversal in what has been among the top performing sectors of US equity markets for the past two years.

“Some investors are rotating out of biopharma into financial, technology, industrial and consumer sectors,” says Ying Huang, analyst at Barclays. “Investors are wondering if we have seen the peak of biotech for the foreseeable future.”

Biotech bears point to the sector’s stretched valuations, with stocks trading at an average 400 times reported earnings and almost 94 times estimated forward earnings, as evidence of a bubble.

The sector has always had a feel of the casino. While big pharma’s research and development risks are insulated by strong cash flow from existing products, biotech companies often involve bets on the success of a single experimental drug.

But, even by the industry’s high-rolling standards, some of the valuation rises of the past year have been exceptional.

Take Intercept Pharmaceuticals, a Manhattan-based company with 50 employees which reported revenues of $1.6m and net losses of $67.8m in 2013.

There are high hopes for the company because it is developing what would be the first approved drug for a form of liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, which affects up to 5 per cent of Americans and is rising in incidence because of a connection with obesity.

Since listing at $15-a-share in 2012, the stock is now more than 20 times higher at around $346, valuing the company at $6.75bn. On one day in January its shares climbed nearly fourfold on the back of positive clinical trial data.

Yet, the stock has fallen more than 25 per cent in the past week – outstripping the wider market decline – after Intercept revealed that patients taking part in a trial had experienced an unusually high number of heart-related problems.

The company is still confident of the treatment’s prospects but the setback brought a reminder that apparent wonder drugs are often derailed before reaching market.

Biotech bulls say such risks are more than outweighed by the potential rewards, pointing to the success of Gilead, whose new Sovaldi drug could top $5bn of sales this year – by far the most successful launch in industry history.

Others such as Biogen Idec have also produced huge returns for early investors as breakthrough drugs have catapulted them into the realm of big pharma.

Optimists say this time really is different to previous booms and busts because of advances in genetic science that enable companies to develop more targeted treatments for niche patient groups. This allows them to be tested in smaller trials, which accelerates development.

They also point to cuts in R&D investment by big pharma that has left the industry increasingly reliant on innovation from smaller biotech companies, either through lucrative licensing deals or takeovers.

Among the 10 biggest biotech companies, average annual sales and earnings growth is more than three times that of the S&P 500 average. “You could argue for much higher price to earnings than we are currently seeing,” says Mark Schoenebaum, biotech analyst at ISI.

The sector’s strength has been fed by a flood of generalist investors chasing growth stocks. This has supported more than 60 US biotech IPOs in the past year with more scrambling to reach market before the window closes.

Vadim Zlotnikov, strategist at AllianceBernstein, says the recent sell-off is part of a broader downward re-rating of growth stocks as improving economic prospects and a rising interest rate environment reduces the appeal of long-term gambles.

“It feels gut-wrenching,” says one large investor. “But I don’t think it is time to get out because the fundamentals haven’t changed.” The next few weeks will reveal whether others have equally steely nerves.