The Case for Cash: Once shunned, putting cash on the sidelines now looks shrewd to some investors
September 22, 2013 Leave a comment
September 20, 2013, 10:53 a.m. ET
The Case for Cash
Once shunned, putting cash on the sidelines now looks shrewd to some investors. Brett Arends explains
A FRIEND WAS recently considering a potential investment for her portfolio and asked a simple question: Is it better than any of the alternatives that are currently out there? My answer surprised her: The real question is whether it’s also better than any of the alternatives that you are likely to see in the next year or two. For most mainstream investment professionals—including many of those with some pricey clients—that kind of an argument is near-sacrilege. It means, they say, trying to “time” the market. Their advice is usually along the lines of investing everything, everything, immediately, in the (high fee) products they make available. But this is flawed thinking. If the events of the last 15 years have shown anything, it is that turmoil and financial bargains seem to come along with great frequency. If there are no compelling opportunities on offer at the moment, wait a while. One will be coming along soon—in the next great panic about Europe, or emerging markets, or U.S. subprime mortgages, or gold, or China, or commodities, or high oil prices, or low oil prices, or inflation, or deflation or something else entirely. Read more of this post







