NBER: Informed Trading and Expected Returns
May 2, 2013 Leave a comment
Informed Trading and Expected Returns
Stocks with the greatest information asymmetry have annualized returns that are 10.8 percentage points higher than stocks with the least information asymmetry.
In Informed Trading and Expected Returns (NBER Working Paper No. 18680), co-authors James Choi, Li Jin, andHongjun Yan use daily institutional ownership data from the Shanghai Stock Exchange to examine whether information asymmetry affects expected stock returns. They argue that focusing on China is useful because there is likely to be significant variation across companies in how much private information is shared with select investors, largely as a result of the state of Chinese legal institutions and regulations. The authors first show that stocks bought heavily by institutions subsequently outperform stocks sold heavily by institutions. Thus, institutions appear to have a strong information advantage over individual investors, and that is true for stocks of all sizes. Moreover, the authors confirm that the institutional sector’s future information advantage is larger in stocks that it previously traded more aggressively. Therefore, the aggressiveness of institutional trading in a stock, as measured by prior institutional ownership volatility, can be used as an ex ante predictor of future information asymmetry in this stock. Sorting stocks based on this predictor of information asymmetry, the authors find that the 20 percent of stocks with the greatest information asymmetry have future annualized returns that are 10.8 percentage points higher than the 20 percent of stocks with the least information asymmetry. This difference remains significant for ten months after the initial sorting month—the same amount of time that the difference in institutional information advantage between the two portfolios lasts. There is no evidence of subsequent return reversals. They conclude that information asymmetry increases the cost of capital. –Claire Brunel
Informed Trading and Expected Returns
James J. Choi, Li Jin, Hongjun Yan
NBER Working Paper No. 18680
Issued in January 2013
Does information asymmetry affect the cross-section of expected stock returns? Using institutional ownership data from the Shanghai Stock Exchange, we show that institutions have a strong information advantage over individual investors. We then show that the aggressiveness of institutional trading in a stock—measured by the average absolute weekly change in institutional ownership during the past year—is an ex ante predictor of future information asymmetry in this stock. Sorting stocks on this information asymmetry predictor, we find that the top quintile outperforms the bottom quintile next month by 10.8% annualized, suggesting that information asymmetry raises the cost of capital.
