Listed companies under fire over reception costs; China Railway Construction topped the list with a total spend of 837 million yuan, or 10% of the company’s profits
May 7, 2013 Leave a comment
Listed companies under fire over reception costs
(Xinhua)
08:36, May 07, 2013
BEIJING, May 6 (Xinhua) — The exorbitant spending on receptions by some Chineselisted companies has came under fierce criticism from netizens in the midst of thecountry’s campaign against extravagance.
The Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges required all listed companies to releaseannual reports for 2012 by the end of April.
These reports showed that the reception costs of nine companies exceeded 100 millionyuan (16.1 million U.S. dollars), according to statistics from Panorama Network Co., Ltd,a financial information provider.
The top 10 companies in terms of reception costs, including mostly state-ownedenterprises (SOEs), spent a total of 2.9 billion yuan on receptions last year.
China Railway Construction Corporation Limited topped the list with a total spend of837 million yuan, equivalent to about 10 percent of the company’s profit last year.
The figures came under fire in cyberspace, as a frugality campaign has been ongoingacross the country since December.
Hundreds of Chinese websites have so far run reports on the companies’ receptioncosts.
On Sina’s Weibo, China’s most popular microblogging service, more than 170 postingsfocused on this topic after the news came out Monday morning, gaining thousands ofreposts and comments in the same day.
A comment by someone with the screen name “Gengtian 40 Nian” postulated that theexcessive reception expenditure allows room for corruption, saying “the reception feewould be better called a corruption fee.”
Famous Weibo commentator Laoxu Shiping said in a posting that China RailwayConstruction’s reception fee may well exceed the given figure.
A netizen with the screen name “Sanshanliushui Woheshan” called for the release ofdetails on how exactly the money was spent. “Who is receiving it? What are they doingfor it and how much does it cost?” the netizen asked.
Chinese premier Li Keqiang vowed in March to keep expenditure on governmentoverseas visits, vehicles and receptions from growing during his tenure.
Most government departments have cut their spending in the three areas as part of thefrugality campaign that prohibits officials and military officers from engaging inextravagant behavior.
Some people argue that listed firms, especially SOEs, should also comply with therequirements of the campaign as their funds belong to shareholders.
Sun Lijian, a professor with Fudan University, said in a Weibo posting that theexorbitant reception spending may be closely related to more deep-rooted problems.
“[These companies] can obtain more business opportunities by offering receptions andgifts, which may be a root for corruption among the top management and the unfaircompetition between SOEs and privately owned companies,” Sun said.
The high expenses may also be related to low efficiency in the companies’ internalgovernance and a potential problem of tax evasion, according to the professor.
He urged companies to unveil detailed information about reception fees, althoughcorporate law does not make this a requirement at present.
