Did Analysts Contribute to the Disappearance of the Accrual Anomaly? Our results conflict with the widely-held notion that analysts are sophisticated information intermediaries who improve market efficiency
May 30, 2013 Leave a comment
Did Analysts Contribute to the Disappearance of the Accrual Anomaly?
Sami Keskek University of Arkansas – Sam M. Walton College of Business
Senyo Y. Tse Texas A&M University – Lowry Mays College & Graduate School of Business
May 20, 2013
Abstract:
We use the recent disappearance of the accrual anomaly to investigate analysts’ contribution to improved information processing by investors. Prior research finds that investors and analysts made similar accrual-related pricing and forecast errors, respectively, in the anomaly period. As sophisticated information intermediaries, analysts could have initiated the disappearance of the anomaly by issuing forecasts that are free of accrual-related bias. We find, however, that both expert (e.g., all-star) and non-expert analysts continue to issue forecasts with predictable accrual-related bias after the disappearance of the accrual anomaly. Furthermore, the accrual anomaly is similar for firms followed by analysts and for non-followed firms, and disappears at the same time for both. Thus, investors began to correctly incorporate accruals information in security prices even though analysts continued issuing earnings forecasts that have predictable accrual-related bias. Our results conflict with the widely-held notion that analysts are sophisticated information intermediaries who improve market efficiency.