Which Institutional Investors are More Effective Monitors, Domestic or Foreign? Evidence from International Earnings Management
August 15, 2013 Leave a comment
Incheol Kim University of South Florida
Steve Miller Saint Joseph’s University
Hong Wan State University of New York at Oswego
Bin Wang University of South Florida
July 27, 2013
Abstract:
We study the impact of domestic and foreign institutional investors on earnings management in 37 non-U.S. countries from 2000 to 2009. We find that domestic institutions are more effective than foreign institutions at constraining earnings management. Further, the deterrence effect on earnings management is larger when institutions are more independent, when firms have higher levels of asymmetric information, or when the firms’ countries are characterized by greater information asymmetry and stronger investor protection. Our results are consistent with the argument that geographic proximity enhances monitoring effectiveness. Our paper shows that monitoring effectiveness is impacted by a plethora of factors and offers a nuanced view on the subject, which suggests that different institutions have comparative advantages in performing different monitoring tasks.
