Keeping debt a dirty secret from investors
PUBLISHED: 28 MAR 2013 00:33:00 | UPDATED: 29 MAR 2013 00:31:10
CHRISTOPHER JOYE, The Australian Financial Review

Ask yourself this question: is the amount of debt a company assumes, the rate of interest it pays, the events of default, the repayment date and all non-standard conditions (or “covenants”) vital to working out the value of that company’s equity? Any half-witted analyst or investor will emphatically answer “yes”.
Yet when I ask Damian Reichel, a partner at law firm Johnson, Winter & Slattery whether it is standard practice for companies listed on the Australian Stock Exchange to disclose all the terms and conditions of their debt arrangements, he responds: “No, it’s not standard at all. It is, however, normal to disclose the amount of debt outstanding in the company’s accounts and maturity dates so that people know when facilities expire.”
This is a problem that weighs heavily on the minds of sophisticated investors, analysts and even some regulators. While market convention is to disclose little information about a company’s leverage, it is vital to determining its equity value, even if lay retail investors tend to ignore it.
If a company’s capital structure is comprised of debt and equity, it is impossible to price one in isolation from the other. Debt directly subordinates equity in two ways: first, it has a prior-ranking entitlement to the company’s earnings for interest repayments; second, debt ranks ahead of equity if the business is wound up.
The introduction of debt into a capital structure exposes shareholders to new risks. And individuals and companies default on their obligations all the time. When they do, the lender has the right to force asset sales at prices often far below fair value, which inflicts losses on those standing last in the queue – shareholders. Read more of this post
Like this:
Like Loading...