The Making of McPaper: The Inside Story of USA Today

The Making of McPaper: The Inside Story of USA Today [Hardcover]

Peter S. Prichard (Author)

making-mcpaper-inside-story-how-usa-today-made-david-paperback-cover-art

Publication Date: September 1987

In 1982 the Gannett Company, the nation’s biggest newspaper chain, launched USA TODAY. USA TODAY celebrates its 25th anniversary in 2007. The brainchild of Al Neuharth, it was the most expensive, most closely watched newspaper debut in history. Journalists called it “McPaper,” the “titan of tidbits,” and “junk-food journalism.” No newspaper executive had ever put so many millions and so many careers on the line. This updated edition of Peter S. Prichard’s acclaimed 1987 release includes an afterward by longtime USA TODAY writer and editor David Colton. This updated section completes the story of the first century of “The Nation’s Newspaper.” Colton catches up with the founders and examines the journalistic achievements that have gained “McPaper” respect. Readers of USA TODAY – millions of them – will find this a fascinating, behind-the-scenes story of the battle to build a newspaper that has grown to redefine modern journalism. Readers of business histories will find it a classic case study of a bigrisk, big-reward business start-up.Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Newsweek once derisively referred to USA Today as “McPaper, the Big Mac of Journalism.” But subsequent developments indicate that Americans have taken to this first national, general-interest daily newspaper virtually everywhere except New York and Washington and that its circulation is now among the three largest in the country. In this history, Prichard, a USA Today staffer, covers the planning sessions for the Gannett-chain paper, evidently based largely on corporate president Allen Neuharth’s successful launch of a paper in the Cape Kennedy area; the role of Neuharth in driving the project to reality; the problems of circulation and distribution; the staggering difficulty of luring advertisers; and the huge deficits the paper racked up in its early years. A company history, the tone of the writing is rather fevered, and it is clear that this is not the work of an entirely objective reporter. Photos not seen by PW.
Copyright 1987 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal

“McPaper”but Gannett chairman Al Neuharth is no clownish Ronald McDonald. He is decribed as an egomaniacal, manipulative, brilliant, driven press lord obsessed with the success of his national newspaper. Prichard, managing editor of cover stories at USA Today , tells all at Neuharth’s request; but Neuharth did not censor and Gannett did not subsidize. We read about the five-year-old paper’s struggle to make money, internal rearranging and squabbling, constant staff turnover, drain on the Gannett newspaper chain, and Neuharth’s self-appointed role of lord and master. This revealing, well-written book would be riveting fiction. Horrifically, it is not. Jo Cates, Poynter Inst. for Media Studies, St. Petersburg, Fla.
Copyright 1987 Reed Business Information, Inc.

September 17, 2007

At 25, ‘McPaper’ Is All Grown Up

By RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA

This summer, a series of long, investigative articles explored why most American troops in Iraq still do not have vehicles that could protect them from explosives, though the vehicles were available years ago and the Iraqi military has them.

The series appeared in USA Today — yes, USA Today, the newspaper that pioneered vivid color and microarticles, favored the upbeat over the serious and sprinkled its pages with frivolous graphics (we sure do like tuna sandwiches for lunch, America). But no close reader would have been surprised to see tough reporting alongside the flash.

USA Today, which turned 25 on Saturday, still stands apart as a lighter and quicker read than most of its competitors. And, as many journalists feared it might, USA Today, once derided as “McPaper,” has made a lasting mark on American newspapers in general, prodding many drab dailies to print shorter articles, switch to color, devote more space to sports and use more pictures and graphics.

But at the same time, USA Today has gradually become more like other papers — more substantive, more serious, more likely to give ample space to at least a few big stories. The newspaper has grown up from a caricatured outsider to a respectable part of the establishment that competitors, government and business must take seriously.

“There’s still a wide spread between what other major newspapers look like and read like, and USA Today, but it’s not as wide as it was,” said Allen H. Neuharth, the former Gannett chairman and chief executive who created USA Today.

The paper, which lost something like $1 billion in its first decade, is now a money-maker with weekday circulation of 2.3 million, the largest of any American newspaper. But like the rest of the industry, it is facing the challenge of readers and advertisers fleeing to the Internet for news and information.

In some ways, USA Today seems well suited for the challenge. The paper was built to capitalize on a then-novel idea — American society was becoming more mobile — long before there was the Web, cellphones or Wi-Fi connections. The paper was designed to appeal to business travelers — half its copies are distributed through hotels — and to people who have relocated from one part of the country to another. For both groups, it offers a consistent, easy-to-read product with some news from back home, and a national perspective on news and sports that most local papers lack.

It also had features specifically targeted to those groups, like the full-page, colorful national weather map that was widely imitated almost immediately, comprehensive sports coverage and aggressive reporting on the airline industry.

USA Today’s graphic approach, its relatively young audience and its habit of encouraging reader feedback presaged some aspects of the Internet, though it remains to be seen whether its status as a popular innovator will carry into the online future. Since its Web site was overhauled early this year, readers have been able to post comments on all articles, look up every comment by a particular reader and start conversations among themselves.

The site offers a lot of Web-only content like video and blogs, some with avid followings, but an attempt last year to let readers personalize the site for the news they want fell flat, with few people taking advantage of it. Over all, USAToday.com attracts 9 to 10 million unique viewers each month, according to Nielsen/NetRatings, second only to The New York Times’s site among newspapers — but that number has been flat for a few years.

Twenty-five years ago, Mr. Neuharth had staked his career — and possibly Gannett’s future — on his vision of a national newspaper, created from scratch, despite near-universal skepticism and the need to bleed resources from other Gannett papers to pull it off. For years, most of the staff were young people drawn from other papers, usually as temporary “loaners,” with their home papers still paying their salaries. They were green, but were willing to accept USA Today’s constraints and endure the slights from colleagues and sources.

“None of us had the Washington pedigree, and we just felt lucky to be there,” said Bill Nichols, one of the original loaners when he was 25, who stayed and covered the White House and State Department. He left this year to become the managing editor at Politico, a Web site and newspaper devoted to politics.

The difference between USA Today and the rest of the industry was evident from the first day, Sept. 15, 1982.

On that day, most major newspapers had front-page articles on the assassination of Bashir Gemayel, president-elect of Lebanon. In USA Today, the assassination got a brief mention in a front-page news summary box, and a short article inside the paper. On the upper half of the page was a photograph of a jet crash in Spain, with a headline that, in keeping with Mr. Neuharth’s edict to focus on good news, said, “Miracle: 327 survive, 55 die.”

Dominating the page was another death — that of Princess Grace of Monaco, in a car crash. She was on a lot of other front pages that day, but less prominently.

“Oh my God, did the mainstream journalists and critics howl at that page — you would have thought we’d killed somebody,” said Anne Goodfriend, an editor and later a columnist at USA Today from its creation to 2001. “But it really helped create an us-against-the-world atmosphere.”

(Fifteen years later, when another princess died in a car wreck, it was taken for granted that nearly every newspaper would lead with Diana.)

USA Today quickly became known for its “snapshots,” illustrated, stand-alone charts that were parodied in Garry Trudeau’s Doonesbury comic strip. There were as many briefs as full-fledged articles, and the articles were short — even a serious subject might get just eight column-inches. It paid scant attention to news overseas.

Lightweight articles were a staple, and the paper insisted on referring to Americans as “we” and “us.” Several former reporters and editors remember a 1983 headline as emblematic: “Men, Women: We’re Still Different.” A reporter told the Columbia Journalism Review, “The operative factor in whether a story runs is sometimes whether it has a color picture.”

“We get much more credit for starting things than we should, because we stole most of them from the tube,” said Mr. Neuharth, who acknowledges cheerfully that some of the experimentation went too far.

The initial reaction within the profession was harsh. Ben Bradlee, the revered Washington Post editor, was quoted as saying, “If USA Today is a good newspaper, then I’m in the wrong business.”

Mr. Neuharth and his staff embraced the derision. He replied that at least he and Mr. Bradlee agreed on one thing — “that he’s in the wrong business.” People in the newsroom adopted the “McPaper” label.

USA Today quickly won a large readership, more than 800,000 within a year, and men especially liked its comprehensive sports section. But it needed to offer advertisers an even bigger audience to overcome the conventional math for profitable newspapering.

Most papers rely heavily on Sunday ads, but USA Today has never published on weekends. It has no home market where it can appeal to local advertisers. To make itself available in nearly the entire country, it is printed in 35 locations, far more than the other national newspapers, The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times.

Many advertisers place the highest value on readers with individual subscriptions, who account for more than 60 percent of circulation at The Journal and The Times, but less than 14 percent at USA Today.

Gannett does not break out figures for individual newspapers, but it has said that USA Today’s first year in the black was 1993, when circulation reached 1.6 million. Company executives say that it continues to make healthy profits, even though it does not have the 20 percent margins of many of their smaller papers.

Through the 1980s and 1990s, as its people became more experienced and the staff expanded, the paper became more serious. Official Washington and big business began to see it as a force to reckon with.

In the 1990s, Peter S. Prichard, the top editor, and David Mazzarella, who succeeded him, and then-publisher Tom Curley accelerated the push toward hard news. USA Today’s leaders said they found that increasing hard news drove up circulation. In a perverse sign of its growing stature, a journalistic scandal in 2003 and 2004 over fabrications by Jack Kelley, a star foreign correspondent, drew national attention.

But in many ways, USA Today remains different from its competitors, down to its location. It is headquartered not in a major city, but in a wooded patch of McLean, Va., a suburb of Washington. The news staff has grown to more than 500 people — among the nation’s biggest, but less than half that of The Times, and far smaller than those of The Journal, The Washington Post or The Los Angeles Times.

“The majority of our readers don’t read us every day, so there is no expectation of incremental coverage,” said Ken Paulson, editor since 2004. “We can pick our spots, and we don’t have to cover a story every step of the way.”

In fact, Mr. Paulson has explicitly told his staff to get away from one of the dutiful habits he says crept in over the last decade — matching big stories reported by competitors. “We want to run stories that nobody else has, where we’re driving the conversation,” he said.

But the chip on their collective shoulder is still there. “We have never won a Pulitzer Prize, which really doesn’t matter,” he said. “But it would be nice to get rid of that asterisk.”

About bambooinnovator
Kee Koon Boon (“KB”) is the co-founder and director of HERO Investment Management which provides specialized fund management and investment advisory services to the ARCHEA Asia HERO Innovators Fund (www.heroinnovator.com), the only Asian SMID-cap tech-focused fund in the industry. KB is an internationally featured investor rooted in the principles of value investing for over a decade as a fund manager and analyst in the Asian capital markets who started his career at a boutique hedge fund in Singapore where he was with the firm since 2002 and was also part of the core investment committee in significantly outperforming the index in the 10-year-plus-old flagship Asian fund. He was also the portfolio manager for Asia-Pacific equities at Korea’s largest mutual fund company. Prior to setting up the H.E.R.O. Innovators Fund, KB was the Chief Investment Officer & CEO of a Singapore Registered Fund Management Company (RFMC) where he is responsible for listed Asian equity investments. KB had taught accounting at the Singapore Management University (SMU) as a faculty member and also pioneered the 15-week course on Accounting Fraud in Asia as an official module at SMU. KB remains grateful and honored to be invited by Singapore’s financial regulator Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to present to their top management team about implementing a world’s first fact-based forward-looking fraud detection framework to bring about benefits for the capital markets in Singapore and for the public and investment community. KB also served the community in sharing his insights in writing articles about value investing and corporate governance in the media that include Business Times, Straits Times, Jakarta Post, Manual of Ideas, Investopedia, TedXWallStreet. He had also presented in top investment, banking and finance conferences in America, Italy, Sydney, Cape Town, HK, China. He has trained CEOs, entrepreneurs, CFOs, management executives in business strategy & business model innovation in Singapore, HK and China.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: