Playing It Safe Is Riskier than You Think

Playing It Safe Is Riskier than You Think

by Bill Taylor  |   9:00 AM September 17, 2013

There are all sorts of reasons why so many big organizations can be slow to make changes that everyone agrees need to be made. “Our current margins are too good, even though the business is being eroded by new competitors.” “Our current products are still popular, even though a new generation of offerings is getting traction.” “Our current distribution system can’t reach the customers we need to reach to build a new business.”In other words, most leaders and organizations are really good at quantifying the risks of trying something bold or striking out in a new direction. What are the downsides of and obstacles to introducing a new product or targeting a new market? They are far less adept at reckoning honestly with the risks of staying the course. What’s the worst that can happen if we do more of the same?

In a very real sense, the first job of leadership is to identify and overcome the costs of complacency. To persuade colleagues at every level that there are genuine risks for the failure to take risks—that the only thing they have to fear, is the fear of change itself.

And if you can overcome that fear, it’s remarkable what can happen. A fascinating white paper by Bradley Johnson, director of data analytics with Advertising Age, makes the case that difficult and uncertain times are often the best times for organizations to separate themselves from the pack, so long as their leaders are prepared not to stand pat. Johnson looked at the lowest point of the Great Depression (August 1929-March 1933), the Great Stagflation of 1973-1975, and the Carter/Reagan recession of 1980-1982. What’s remarkable about these three periods of economic trauma, he reminds us, is that the problems they posed inspired creative responses that reshaped markets for decades to come.

One representative example from the Depression: General Motors had to figure out how to maintain its upscale Buick brand in a sinking economy. The solution? Persuade consumers to buy a used Buick rather than a cheaper new car—a way to keep struggling dealers afloat and hold back the encroachment of rival brands. It was a daring idea at the time, and it reshaped dealer economics and marketing priorities. (If only GM’s modern-day leaders could have summoned such creativity amidst crisis.)

In a wonderful New Yorker column, James Surowiecki, much like Bradley Johnson, chronicled bold strategic moves that repositioned companies and redefined industries during periods of economic turmoil. He compared how Post and Kellogg, two giants in the packaged-cereal industry, responded to the Great Depression. Post, he wrote—“did the predictable thing” when it “reined in expenses and cut back on advertising.” Kellogg, on the other hand, “doubled its ad budget, moved aggressively into radio advertising, and heavily pushed its new cereal, Rice Krispies.” As a result, Kellogg leapt ahead of its rival and became (and remains) the industry’s dominant player.

So why, he wonders, given all the evidence of the chance to gain ground during periods of economic upheaval, “are companies so quick to cut back when trouble hits?” One answer, he speculates, involves a distinction about risk made by two business professors nearly 25 years ago. In a paper published by the Journal of MarketingPeter Dickson and Joseph Giglierano argue that executives and entrepreneurs face two very different sorts of risks. One is that their organization will make a bold move that fails—a risk they call “sinking the boat.” The other is that their organization will fail to make a bold move that would have succeeded—a risk they call “missing the boat.”

Naturally, most executives worry more about sinking the boat than missing the boat, which is why so many organizations, even in flush times, are so cautious and conservative. To me, though, the opportunity for executives and entrepreneurs is to recognize the power of rocking the boat—searching for big ideas and small wrinkles, inside and outside the organization, that help you make waves and change course. In an era of economic dislocation and technological disruption, you can’t do great things if you’re content with doing things a little differently than how you’ve done them in the past. The costs of complacency have never been greater.

I don’t mean to minimize the challenges, pressures, and potential setbacks that are a necessary part of making real change. But is there any doubt that far too many established organizations are far better at reassuring themselves about the virtues of standing pat than they are at rallying around the benefits of standing out? As Michelangelo famously said, “The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.”

It’s time to aim higher. Playing it safe is riskier than you think.

About bambooinnovator
Kee Koon Boon (“KB”) is the co-founder and director of HERO Investment Management which provides specialized fund management and investment advisory services to the ARCHEA Asia HERO Innovators Fund (, the only Asian SMID-cap tech-focused fund in the industry. KB is an internationally featured investor rooted in the principles of value investing for over a decade as a fund manager and analyst in the Asian capital markets who started his career at a boutique hedge fund in Singapore where he was with the firm since 2002 and was also part of the core investment committee in significantly outperforming the index in the 10-year-plus-old flagship Asian fund. He was also the portfolio manager for Asia-Pacific equities at Korea’s largest mutual fund company. Prior to setting up the H.E.R.O. Innovators Fund, KB was the Chief Investment Officer & CEO of a Singapore Registered Fund Management Company (RFMC) where he is responsible for listed Asian equity investments. KB had taught accounting at the Singapore Management University (SMU) as a faculty member and also pioneered the 15-week course on Accounting Fraud in Asia as an official module at SMU. KB remains grateful and honored to be invited by Singapore’s financial regulator Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to present to their top management team about implementing a world’s first fact-based forward-looking fraud detection framework to bring about benefits for the capital markets in Singapore and for the public and investment community. KB also served the community in sharing his insights in writing articles about value investing and corporate governance in the media that include Business Times, Straits Times, Jakarta Post, Manual of Ideas, Investopedia, TedXWallStreet. He had also presented in top investment, banking and finance conferences in America, Italy, Sydney, Cape Town, HK, China. He has trained CEOs, entrepreneurs, CFOs, management executives in business strategy & business model innovation in Singapore, HK and China.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: