Groundwork Laid for Stricter Regulation of Asset Managers; U.S. Study Concludes Firms Would be Vulnerable in a Financial Panic
October 1, 2013 Leave a comment
September 30, 2013, 6:01 p.m. ET
Groundwork Laid for Stricter Regulation of Asset Managers
U.S. Study Concludes Firms Would be Vulnerable in a Financial Panic
RYAN TRACY
Asset-management firms such as mutual funds are vulnerable to a financial panic, the Treasury Department said Monday, releasing a study that could lay the groundwork for stricter regulation of such financial players. The finding that the asset-management industry is “vulnerable to shocks” leaves U.S. regulators with a decision about whether to subject large players such as BlackRockInc. BLK -0.12% and Fidelity Investments Inc. to increased oversight.In an effort to spot risks that could lead to another financial crisis, regulators on the Financial Stability Oversight Council have already brought several nonbank financial companies, including American International Group, AIG -1.06% Inc. and the GE Capital Unit of General Electric Co., under federal oversight by designating them as “systemically important.” Banks with $50 billion or more in assets are automatically considered systemically important.
But the council’s approach to asset managers has been less clear, in part because the industry is different from banking or insurance. Monday’s report was requested by the council as a basis for judging whether asset managers should face the similar rules on capital requirements and other matters.
The report from staff at the Treasury Department’s Office of Financial Research said asset managers “differ in important ways” from big banks and insurers, pointing out that the money under management is owned by the firms’ clients, who would take losses in a downturn.
Still, the report said the industry is “highly concentrated” and includes nine U.S.-based firms that each have more than $1 trillion under management globally. Even if those firms weren’t themselves a catalyst of financial distress, they play a role in so many financial markets that they “could contribute to the transmission or amplification of risks from one market sector to another” in a crisis, the report said.
“Risk-management practices and structures vary significantly among” asset managers, the report added.
Representatives of BlackRock and Fidelity had no immediate comment.
A spokesman for the Investment Company Institute, which represents asset managers, praised the study for recognizing “key distinctions between asset-management companies and banks and other nonbank financial firms,” but added that designating the firms as systemically important “is not an appropriate regulatory tool for addressing risks, if any, that registered funds or their advisers might raise regarding financial stability.”
Monday’s report doesn’t make any recommendations for the council, which is led by the Treasury secretary and includes the chairman of the Federal Reserve and other top officials.
A spokeswoman for the Treasury Department said the council “will review the study closely as it considers potential next steps relating to asset-management activities and firms.”
The council had asked for the study last year. It now needs to decide whether it will consider asset-management firms for stricter regulation and, if so, whether it needs to adopt new criteria for judging the risk that each individual firm poses to the financial system as a whole. That process could take months.
