Sovereign wealth funds: transparently inadequate; Many SWFs are failing to comply with their own governance standards
October 1, 2013 Leave a comment
September 29, 2013 5:28 pm
Sovereign wealth funds: transparently inadequate
Many SWFs are failing to comply with their own governance standards
Capital markets are in awe of sovereign wealth funds. Many high-profile investments of recent years – the rescue of western banks, buying trophy assets or scooping up natural resources – have involved an SWF as lead investor or chief moneybags. That is helping these institutions to go more mainstream. But as capital markets have changed to adapt to SWFs, it seems that the funds themselves areslower to adapt to the norms of the capital markets.In particular, the world’s SWFs are failing to comply fully with their own code of conduct. An audit byGeoEconomica, a Geneva political risk consultancy, of the 26 funds that drew up the Santiago principles in 2008 reveals a very mixed picture. The principles commit the funds – which manage a combined $3tn – to basic standards of good governance and financial disclosure. None is yet in full compliance; the average across the spectrum is 70 per cent.
Of course, the scale of compliance varies widely. The most compliant with the principles – which concern issues such as policy mandates; the relationships among owners, supervisors and managers; and disclosure surrounding returns – are the SWFs of Norway, New Zealand, Australia, Chile, Alaska and Timor-Leste (which has a petroleum fund). No surprises there – Norway’s $750bn “oil fund” is aglobal standard for governance and disclosure. Bringing up the rear, with less than 60 per cent compliance, are several Middle Eastern SWFs, Russia, Mexico and a handful of others.
Developing-world SWFs can usually talk the talk when it comes to investing. The audit suggests that fewer can actually walk the walk. If nothing else, it strips away some of the mystique surrounding SWFs. It turns out that their mixed record on accountability can now be added to their mixed record on investment returns. The world’s SWFs are not as reliable a guide to investing as they, or their co-investors, might think.
