Trading losses by Singapore teenager spark negligence suit against private bank
August 14, 2013 Leave a comment
PUBLISHED AUGUST 14, 2013
Trading losses by teenager spark negligence suit
Negligence suits taken out by private banking clients are hardly unusual these days; but a case being heard before the High Court today comes with a couple of twists – PHOTO: SPH
The Ows are claiming $2.6 million, the losses which they claim they suffered as a result of the defendants’ actions.
[SINGAPORE] Negligence suits taken out by private banking clients are hardly unusual these days; but a case being heard before the High Court today comes with a couple of twists. At the heart of the matter are losses of $2.6 million suffered by a father and son on account of trades entered into by the son – who had not turned 21 then. Credit Suisse, one of the two defendants, is claiming that Swiss law rather than Singapore law governs its relationship with its clients, the plaintiffs. And that, as such, the younger plaintiff, who was 19 years old at the time, is considered an adult under Swiss law and that the trades he entered into – which resulted in the losses – are valid and binding. Read more of this post







