Identifying Unintentional Error in Restatement Disclosures
June 3, 2013 Leave a comment
Identifying Unintentional Error in Restatement Disclosures
Louise Hayes University of Waterloo – School of Accounting and Finance
May 1, 2013
Abstract:
Research attention is frequently focused on fraud and earnings management; however, unintentional errors in audited financial statements of public companies occur frequently. Currently, archival study of unintentional error is hampered by the lack of a refined error proxy. The purpose of this study is to develop a proxy for restatements that correct unintentional errors. Using an automated text search, I discover language asserting or implying lack of intent in 751 restatement announcements disclosed after enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). I validate this proxy for restatements that correct unintentional error by analyzing differences in restatement characteristics and earning quality measures between these 751 restatements and 127 restatements that correct intentional misstatements which I identify by reading SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases (AAERs). I find, relative to restatements that correct intentional misstatements, that the proxy for restatements that correct unintentional error is associated with proportionately fewer revenue recognition issues, less positive accruals, less income persistence, and a lower likelihood of meeting and beating analysts’ forecasts by a small amount. Future study of the associations between restatements that correct unintentional error and the expertise and incentives of CFOs, CEOs, audit committee members and auditors may lead to a more nuanced understanding of reporting quality. Thus, this validated proxy has the potential to contribute to future research and improvements in audit, internal control, and governance mechanisms.
